Category Archives: North Africa

Sudan – Khartoum fighting for control of Darfur gold

Sudan Tribune/allAfrica

Khartoum — A new report argues that the Sudanese government’s struggle for control of Darfur’s gold resources, rather than inter-tribal conflicts is behind the recent surge in violence in the war-torn western region.

The report, titled Darfur’s Gold Rush: State-Sponsored Atrocities 10 Years after the Genocide, has cast doubt on official rhetoric from Khartoum that tribal rivalries are to blame for rising instability.

It found that the Sudanese government is complicit in a violent power play for control of North Darfur’s lucrative gold mines, as part of its heightened economic interest in the region and an ongoing campaign of “state-sponsored atrocity”.

According to the report released earlier this month by the US-based Enough Project, Arab Abbala tribesmen are being armed by Khartoum as part of a bid to wrest control of gold fields in Jebel Amer from the Beni Hussein tribe, who are the traditional custodians of the area.

“While we do not have documented evidence that the government of Sudan ordered the Abbala offensive, it’s clear that the historically state-aligned tribe, with ties to the janjaweed, was not acting without at least tacit government consent”, researchers noted.

VIOLENCE ESCALATES:

The escalation of violence since January 2013 has plunged the region into the worst humanitarian crisis in recent years.

The UN estimates that some 150,000 people have been displaced following a spate of attacks by armed Abbala militias, elements of which include the notorious janjaweed forces, which hit the headlines 10 years ago for brutal atrocities allegedly committed at the behest of the Sudanese government.

The report argues that Khartoum has again reprised the role of Abbala militia as a “tool of state repression”, suggesting the government is employing the same “paralleling tactics” it used during the height of the conflict in 2003-04.

“For over a decade, the government of Sudan has pursued a strategy of economic plunder of the periphery through violence and forcible demographic change”, the report said.

A sedentary farming and cattle-rearing Arab community, the Beni Hussein have historically been exempted from attack by state-sponsored militias. However, the recent discovery of gold reserves in their home area, and intense economic pressure on the Sudanese government following South Sudan’s secession and the subsequent loss of oil revenues, has fundamentally altered that dynamic, the report said.  allAfrica

Sudan – government forces still bombing Nuba

Vice

People in Sudan Are Hiding in Caves Because the Government Is Bombing Them

 

Nuba refugees who have been forced to live in caves to avoid the government bombs.

In 1955, a civil war began northern and southern Sudan. What followed was 17 years of bloodshed as the predominately Muslim north and mostly animist or Christian south shot, burned and stabbed each other over being born in different parts of the country. In 1972, in terms with the Addis Ababa Agreement, the fighting stopped and everyone got on relatively well for ten years. Then, in 1983, then President Gafaar Nimeiry decided to try and instate Sharia law throughout the country and make the increasingly autonomous south a federal state of Sudan.

Obviously the southerners didn’t like that, so back to war they went – for 22 years, until a peace agreement was signed in 2005. Eventually, after over half a decade of fighting, a referendum was held to vote over whether the two regions should just cut their losses, part ways, become their own countries and stop killing each other. A 98.9 percent majority in the south voted that they should, so on the 9th of July, 2011, South Sudan became independent from the Republic of Sudan.

However, a couple of months before that happened, Ahmed Haroun was elected governor of South Kordofan, a Sudanese region bordering South Sudan and home to many pro-South Sudan communities. As you might expect from an election involving Haroun – a man accused of multiple crimes against humanity and a long-standing member of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir’s government – the results were controversial.

The majority of the local population and the man Haroun was running against, Abdeaziz al-Hilu – a commander in the SPLA, the army of the Republic of South Sudan – claimed that they had been cheated. Their feelings presumably bolstered by the fact that South Sudan was set to gain its independence two months later, meaning that a Sudanese government official would be in charge of pro-South Sudan citizens who were about to find themselves on the wrong side of the border, rather than a well-respected member of their own national army.

No one likes being cheated – not in poker, not while buying second hand sporting equipment and certainly not into having a governor whose people have been at war with your people for a good 50 years. So al-Hilu helped to form the Sudanese People Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N), a rebel army set up with other members of the SPLA who remained in Sudan following South Sudan’s independence. He then sent them to fight Haroun’s men in the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the military of the Republic of Sudan.

Most of al-Hilu’s rebel army come from the Nuba tribe, a pro-South Sudan group comprising of both Muslims and Christians who live in the mountains of South Kordofan. Unfortunately for the rest of the Nuba, that small detail meant that they were the first to feel the SAF’s backlash, which came in the form of an intensive bombing campaign targeting their homes.

By July of 2012, an estimated half a million people had been displaced from within South Kordofan. Reports started to emerge of families being forced to eat leaves to survive and of Haroun ordering his troops to kill absolutely anyone they came across. I also learned through the Enough Project – a group of activists fighting genocide in Sudan and South Sudan – that thousands of innocent civilians had resorted to living in caves in the Nuba Mountains to keep safe from the SAF bombs.

In October, 2012, I went to the Yida refugee camp in South Sudan, 20 miles away from where the Sudanese government is attempting to eradicate the Nuba people. At the time of my arrival, over 65,000 people had fled to the camp from South Kordofan.

I didn’t hear any bombs for the first few days, and South Kordofan actually began to look like a relatively picturesque area. At times, it reminded me a bit of the south of France; 900 miles away from any water, yes, but also the kind of place you could see Philip Green building a modest getaway palace or anyone from the Tatler list getting married to a European conglomerate heir. In fact, the only sign of war were a few holes in the ground that my guide Charles had pointed out. But everyone knows that holes can mean absolutely anything, and I was glad to see that the area appeared peaceful.

However, early one morning as Charles and I were driving through the desert, we spotted five or six children walking along the side of a mountain. Pulling over, we made our way up the rocks and were met by another 20 children all covered in dirt – the first refugees we’d met outside of the camps. They were apparently waiting for their elders to come back and, although they were initially pretty animated, you could tell by the way they moved (very slowly) that they were exhausted.

“I don’t know why we’re here. I don’t understand why there’s an aeroplane dropping bombs on us,” Narsa, an eight-year-old girl, told me.

“Why don’t you go to the Yida refugee camp instead of staying in a cave?” I asked her.

“My mother doesn’t want to go there. She doesn’t know what’s there and we don’t want to give our village up.”

Narsa told me that three families, including her own, had moved there – close to the SPLM-N’s military base, an obvious target for the Sudanese government’s forces – because it was safer than staying in their huts. The cave she took us to was no taller than 70cm and maybe two or three metres in length, yet 20 people somehow managed to share it every night.

Maria’s camp within the cave. Her husband carries a rifle with him everywhere he goes, “just in case”.

In another cave nearby – close to Meitan, the northern frontline of the region held by the SPLM-N – I met Maria, a mother of five. “They [the SAF] burned down our houses, so we have no other choice but to stay in caves, like animals,” she explained. Maria was quick to tell me about the daily flyover of Antonov aircraft, the Ukrainian-built bombers that the Sudanese government use to sporadically lay waste to the local population.

“We couldn’t stay where we were. The Antonov were coming all the time,” she told me. “And when it wasn’t the Antonov, they fired rockets at us instead.” Next to Maria was a bed, a jerry can, a plastic stool, a few sacks of grains and an iron basin. This was all her family took when they fled their home. “We left everything behind, but I won’t leave my land; I won’t let the SAF take it. We will stay until the end. The only food we have left is almost gone already and we have to wait ten months before the next crop. We can’t go to the field to grow food because the Antonov could come and kill us.”

At first, the SAF targeted the surrounding villages, destroying almost every house in the Meitan region. But since early 2013, the government forces have also been targeting the mountains. “We stay here all day, we can only go down to get muddy water from the stream,” Narsa’s younger brother Uhana told me. “I hate living here; there are snakes and scorpions everywhere.” Explaining the conundrum they’ve found themselves in, Maria added, “Our elders and our children are here with us. They are already struggling to survive in the caves and we can’t make them walk four or five days to go to a refugee camp – they would die. So we stay.”

A week later, I drove to the northern region of South Kordofan, near Kadugli, the area’s capital city. There, I got speaking to an SPLM-N commander, who insisted that two of his soldiers escort me if I wanted to go back up into the caves. An hour later, the three of us were driving into the jungle in an old pick-up for one of their routine patrols. Their sole armament consisted of a few sub-machine guns they’d recovered from the War in Darfur.

Narsa and her siblings lying in their cave.

After hours of driving along bumpy roads, we finally made a stop at one of the caves. From where we stood, we could see one of the frontlines and a number of SAF soldiers patrolling the area with Berettas in hand. The younger of the two soldiers – Nader, a 19-year-old Nuba – joined the SPLM-N in early 2012.

“Before joining the rebels, I lived in one of the caves near Kadugli with my brothers and sisters, like all those who didn’t leave or surrender,” he told me, taking an impressively long drag on his cigarette. I asked about his family. “I haven’t seen them in months. The way we live is worse than anything,” he said. I asked him what’s got worse since the beginning of the war. “Everything. The Nuba eat leaves and drink horrible water. Do you know why? Because the SAF target the boreholes where we get our water – they destroyed every single one of them.”

The other soldier, Michael, seemed more at ease than his slightly anxious partner. “The reason we keep fighting is because we consider this land as our own,” he said, implying that the Sudanese government are trying to kill off anyone loyal to South Sudan so they can move in and freely claim the land. “This is our home – not theirs. We won’t surrender.”

Some of the children living in caves along the mountain range.

Near the end of my patrol with the SPLM-N members, while driving through the Sahel desert towards the Yida camp, Michael – exhausted by the heat and the day’s work – asked me, “Why don’t you people see us? Why do they all talk about Syria but never about us?”

The Nuba have been left alone to face a government that wants them dead, and it seems that the realisation of that is only just beginning to set in on an international scale, two years after the conflict began. In December 2012, Human Rights Watch (HRW) stated that the government’s attacks against civilians in South Kordofan may amount to war crimes. Considering the ridiculously under-equipped SPLM-N rebels are dealing with old, malfunctioning artillery and living in caves while their opponents in the SAF bombard them with aircraft and tanks, it seems that HRW might be on to something.

Those accusations may explain why, in April 2013, President al-Bashir claimed to be open to negotiations with the SPLM-N. Yet, he has already cancelled two meetings with rebel spokesmen that were scheduled for May. When I left in February, 2013, the Sudanese government’s Antonovs were still dropping bombs on the innocent people of South Kordofan.

And it seems to me that, as seems to often be the case with al-Bashir, the Sudanese president is merely playing nice in the media while continuing to murder his own citizens for his own selfish ends. In this case: ridding the most southerly part of his country of anyone loyal to South Sudan and making sure he never has to deal with being challenged again.

More on Sudan and South Sudan:

Darfur’s Tribes are Killing Each Other Over Gold and Water

In the Red Zone with Sudan’s Blue Nile Rebels

Vice

African Union calls for Sudan, South Sudan summit on Abyei

Reuters

Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir (L) and his South Sudan counterpart Salva Kiir address a joint news conference in Juba South Sudan April 12, 2013. REUTERS/Andreea Campeanu

Sudan’s President Omar Hassan al-Bashir (L) and his South Sudan counterpart Salva Kiir address a joint news conference in Juba South Sudan April 12, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andreea Campeanu

KHARTOUM |          Thu May 9, 2013 9:55pm BST

KHARTOUM (Reuters) – The African Union (AU) called on Thursday for an urgent meeting of the leaders from Sudan and South Sudan to find a solution for the flashpoint Abyei region after the killing of a tribal leader and an Ethiopian peacekeeper.

On Saturday, Kuwal Deng Mayok, the chief of the Dinka tribe allied to South Sudan, was killed by a member of the Misseriya tribe in Abyei claimed by Khartoum and Juba. One Ethiopian peacekeeper and 15 Misseriya, who are allied to Sudan, also died, according to the U.N. and the Misseriya.

In March, the African Union brokered a deal between Sudan and South Sudan to resume cross-border oil flows and defuse tensions which have plagued them since the South seceded in 2011 after an independence vote.

But despite several recent meetings, Sudan’s President Omar Hassan al-Bashir and South Sudan’s Salva Kiir have been unable to agree on the ownership of Abyei, which the Dinka and the Arab Misseriya call their home.

Making a new push, the AU “urges the two Heads of State… to meet immediately”, according to a statement released in Addis Ababa. “This grave incident that occurred in Abyei serves to underscore that the status quo in Abyei is not tenable.”

Abyei straddles the border between the two Sudans, which fought one of Africa’s longest civil wars. The province is prized for its fertile land and small oil reserves.

Like South Sudan, Abyei was meant to have an independence vote, agreed under the 2005 peace deal which ended the civil war between the north and south. But Sudan and South Sudan have been unable to agree which tribal members should participate.

Ethiopian peacekeepers have been administering Abyei since Sudan seized it in May 2011 following an attack on a convoy of U.N. peacekeepers and Sudanese soldiers which the United Nations blamed on southern forces. Khartoum later withdrew its forces under a U.N. peace plan.  reuters

Khartoum-armed rebels force South Sudan army from Boma in Jonglei

Reuters

Rebels, army clash in South Sudan’s east

* Unrest has hampered plans for oil exploration (Adds U.N. statement)

By Hereward Holland

JUBA, May 8 (Reuters) – South Sudanese rebels have seized a military base and town after clashing with the army in the east in an escalation of violence that has already uprooted thousands of people and hampered plans to explore for oil.

The rebels, led by David Yau Yau and known as the South Sudan Democratic Army (SSDA), say they want to end corruption and the one-party system led by the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement.

In March, the army launched an offensive against Yau Yau in the eastern state of Jonglei, the country’s largest, where the government wants to search for oil with the help of French firm Total.

The recent fighting has uprooted tens of thousands of people, according to the United Nations.

In an emailed statement, Peter Konyi Kubrin, an SSDA spokesman, said rebels found the bodies of more than 50 soldiers in Boma town after the army fled. The figure could not be independently verified.

Army spokesman Philip Aguer said there had been fighting and that the army withdrew from their base in Boma to the top of a mountain, known as Upper Boma, around two hours’ walk from the main town. He did not give any casualty figures.

“It’s (Boma) divided with the army on the top of the mountain and the rebels at the bottom,” Aguer said. “It’s just a matter of time before we chase them away.”

The United Nations said all aid agencies had moved out their staff from Boma, disrupting health services. “A large proportion of the residents of Boma town also fled, fearing that violence would spread,” the U.N. said in a statement.

Since winning independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has been struggling to impose its authority across vast swathes of territory teeming with weapons after decades of civil war with Khartoum.

Yau Yau, a former theology student, first rebelled in 2010 after failing to win a seat in state parliament. He accepted an amnesty in 2011 only to take up arms again a year later.

Despite a recent thaw in relations between Sudan and South Sudan, Aguer said the rebels were receiving assistance from Sudan’s National Intelligence and Security Services in the form of airdrops of weapons, ammunition and supplies.

“We are convinced beyond reasonable doubt that Khartoum has been supplying them up to now,” Aguer said.

The Geneva-based Small Arms Survey, which tracks weapon supplies, said in a recent report much of the rebels’ equipment comes from Khartoum. Sudan has routinely denied the charges.  reuters

South Sudan-Sudan – Dinka leader killed in clash in Abyei

This is an important story – the killing could bring a renewed outbreak of fighting between the different communities in Abyei and could also provoke further tension between Juba and Khartoum.  It is worth cautioning against thye repetitive and “tribal” approach that pervades a lot of Western coverage of Africa. The man killed was leader of one Dinka community, not of all Dinka, as the opening of the story suggests.

BBC

Sudan tribal leader killed in Abyei region

UN  position in Abyei (17 April 2011)
The disputed border region is being administered by an interim UN security force

A prominent tribal leader in the disputed Sudanese territory of Abyei has been shot dead in an incident involving a rival Arab militia.

Kual Deng Majok, the chief of the Dinka ethnic group, was killed during a stand-off between the Arab Misseriya militia and UN peacekeepers.

There were also reports of UN forces being wounded.

Oil-rich Abyei abuts both Sudan and South Sudan – which seceded in 2011 – and is claimed by the two countries.

The conflict is rooted in a dispute over land between farmers of the pro-South Sudan Dinka Ngok people and cattle-herding Misseriya Arab nomads in the north.

As a result, Abyei remains under the administration of an interim UN security force.

Saturday’s incident began when a convoy of South Sudanese officials looking into the future of Abyei was surrounded by the Arab militia, and the UN tried to secure their release.

A Dinka official told AFP news agency: “The top Dinka leader, Kual Deng Majok, was killed… after he was attacked by Misseriya.”

A Misseriya chief also confirmed the death.

“A group of Misseriya stopped the convoy and started negotiations. Then a clash happened when a [UN] soldier shot one of the Misseriya who was readying his weapon,” the unnamed chief told AFP.

North and South Sudan have suffered decades of conflicts driven by religious and ethnic divides, with an estimated 1.5 million people killed in the civil war. bbc

Kiir to visit Sudan to see first oil flow

Reuters

By Hereward Holland

JUBA |          Fri May 3, 2013 10:22pm BST

JUBA May 3 (Reuters) – South Sudan’s President Salva Kiir will visit Sudan this month to witness with his counterpart Omar Hassan al-Bashir the first shipment of oil from the south after a 15-month shutdown, an official said on Friday.

In March, the African neighbours agreed to resume oil exports from landlocked South Sudan through Sudan and defuse tension that has plagued them since South Sudan seceded in 2011.

Kiir’s planned trip signals a further thaw in relations following a landmark visit by Bashir to Juba in April, his first since the south gained independence in July 2011 under a 2005 peace deal ending decades of civil war.

South Sudan resumed oil production last month, although industry analysts say it may take at least a month for the oil to reach the export terminal at Port Sudan, on the Red Sea.

Kiir will visit both Khartoum and Port Sudan, said Barnaba Marial Benjamin, South Sudan’s government spokesman.

“When (the oil) has reached Port Sudan, that is when the two presidents will go to see the first oil come out of the pipeline, within May probably,” Benjamin told Reuters.

There was no immediate comment from Sudan but local newspapers have reported that Kiir will come in May.

Prior to the shutdown, South Sudan produced at least 300,000 barrels per day, but observers say it may take at least a year to regain such levels.

Damage caused by cross-border skirmishes a year ago means South Sudan can only gradually ramp up production in its Unity State oil fields, which is mixed to produce Nile Blend, a light, sweet, waxy crude.

In the coming days, South Sudan plans to reopen its oil fields in Upper Nile State, which produce Dar Blend, a heavy, sour crude.

Industry experts say Dar Blend production will start at around 50,000 barrels per day, quickly rising to at least 150,000 bpd, while Nile Blend is likely to remain at around 30,000-40,000 bpd for at least six months.   reuters

Sudan – 60 gold miners feared dead in Darfur mine collapse

BBC

A worker pans for gold at a mine in Sudan (27 April 2013)
The government hopes to expand Sudan’s gold industry

At least 60 people are feared dead after a well collapsed at a gold mine in Sudan’s Darfur region on Monday, officials say.

Rescuers were using traditional tools to try to reach the miners amid fears that more wells may collapse, the officials added.

Rival groups in North Darfur fought for control of the mine in February.

Gold has become a key commodity for Sudan since the oil-rich south seceded nearly two years ago.

The split led to Sudan losing about 75% of its oil production.

The government hopes to produce around 50 tonnes of gold in 2013, which could make Sudan Africa’s third-largest gold miner and push it into the top 15 producers globally, Reuters news agency reports.

People are using traditional tools and because of this, the rescue is very slow”  Haroun al-Hassan Government official

 

‘Rescue effort hampered’

The 40m (131ft) deep well at the Jebel ‘Amer mine in North Darfur caved in on Monday.

“The number of people who died is more than 60,” Jebel Amir local commissioner Haroun al-Hassan said, AFP news agency reports.

North Darfur State Acting Governor Al Fatieh Abdeaziz told the BBC that 60 people were unaccounted for, but could not confirm that they were dead.

Mr Hassan said rescue efforts were hampered because of fears that more wells could cave in, AFP reports.

“We cannot use machines because if they came near, the ground will collapse,” he is quoted as saying.

“People are using traditional tools and because of this, the rescue is very slow.”

Some 100,000 people fled fighting after rival Arab groups fought for control of the mine in February, the UN said at the time.

More than a million people have been living in camps for the displaced in Darfur, after a decade of fighting.

Violence in Darfur has come down from its peak after civil war broke out in 2003 but there are still clashes between government forces, rebels, bandits and rival ethnic groups.  bbc

Africa’s Last Colony – UN renews mandate for Western Sahara force

Think Africa Press                  

 After a twenty year impasse, it could take a ‘Sahrawi Spring’ for the Western Sahara to finally gain self-determination.

A UN MINURSO officer chats with locals in Western Sahara. Photograph by UN/Martine Perret.

Today, on 30 April, the mandate of MINURSO – the UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara – is to be renewed yet again.

The UN body was initially set up in 1991 to facilitate the referendum for self-determination promised to the Sahrawi people living in disputed Western Sahara region occupied by Morocco. The planned referendum of 1992 failed to materialise, however, amidst disputes over which Moroccan settlers would be entitled to vote. Further plans – such as the 1997 Houston Accords, the 2001 Baker I Accords and 2003 Baker II Accords – similarly fell short.

These various plans broke down either due to the refusal of Polisario, the Sahrawi national secessionist group, to countenance any agreement which failed to include the option of Sahrawi independence (as in 2001) or due to the Moroccan leadership’s refusal to even discuss such an outcome (as in 2003).

20 years later therefore, MINURSO is still present in the Western Sahara, a referendum is yet to take place, and diplomatic forces remain locked in a stalemate.

Illegal occupation

It is worth stressing that Morocco’s occupation of the Western Sahara – the last colonised territory in Africa – is in violation of international law. As far back as 1963, the Western Sahara was included in a list of territories compiled by the UN which sought self-determination.

The notion of self-determination was already enshrined in the UN Charter and is supported by UN resolution 1514 which stipulates that “all people have the right to self-determination”. This was further supported by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a ruling on 16 October 1975 when it declared that the Western Sahara was not an unoccupied territory (terra nullius) at the time of its colonisation by Spain. The ICJ judgement – oddly requested by the then ruler of Morocco, King Hassan II – declared that Morocco (as well as Mauritania at that time) had no valid claim on the Sahara based on any historic title and that, even if it did, contemporary international law afforded priority to the Sahrawi right to self-determination.

Today, the Sahrawis have been recognised by no fewer than 80 states globally and are also full members of the African Union. Conversely, no country has formally recognised Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara.

One of the reasons behind Morocco’s occupation of the Western Sahara is the immense natural wealth found in the region. Western Sahara has some of the world’s largest phosphate reserves, and control of these provides a tremendous income stream for Morocco, together with the revenue generated from the local fishing industry.

This revenue is crucial for Morocco, especially given the large sums the government has expended in tax incentives for Moroccan settlers to move into Western Sahara, as well as the ongoing cost of maintaining an army in the region (some 100,000 soldiers are stationed in Western Sahara, constituting a third of the total Moroccan population living there).

External positions

Morocco’s intransigence has only been possible thanks to the complicity of Western states, principally the US and France, and aided by Saudi Arabia’s large financial handouts. French and American involvement in the dispute has been marked from the outset by a distinctly pro-Moroccan stance. This can be explained by the fact that Morocco has long been considered a stable Western ally, one that maintains strong economic ties with the US and the European Union. Since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, Morocco has also assumed the role of an important stabilising and anti-al-Qaeda force in the Maghreb.

Morocco, together with its French and American allies, has sought to blame Algeria for the prolonged impasse over the Western Sahara conflict. Algiers has been accused of encouraging Western Saharan independence and of attempting to establish a satellite for itself along its border. However, Algeria has consistently insisted that should a fair and free referendum be held, it would support whatever choice the Sahrawis make. Moreover, as commentators have made clear, even if Algeria were to stop supporting Polisario, it is far from certain that the latter would give up its fight for independence. The same probably cannot be said of Morocco: if the US and France were to withdraw support for Morocco, the kingdom would have little option but to accept a referendum on self-determination.

Meanwhile, Spain – the former colonial overlord of Western Sahara – has maintained an ambiguous position with respect to the conflict. It continues to refuse to recognise the Sahrawi people while also contending that they have not yet had the option of expressing their rights freely. This ‘sitting on the fence’ is explained by the fact that Spain is trying to maintain amicable relations with both Morocco and Algeria in order to preserve its fishing interests and enclaves of Melilla and Ceuta with respect to Morocco, and gas supplies from Algeria.

The winds of change

Given Morocco’s stubbornness over the conflict and the absence of any resolution on the horizon, it is no wonder MINURSO’s mandate has to be renewed once again. In fact, any hope for a referendum may now rest on the political convulsions being experienced across North Africa, a region witnessing the emergence of a boisterous civil society demanding freedom and dignity.

The so-called ‘Internet and Facebook generation’ which has succeeded in ousting despotic regimes in Tunisia and Egypt may well begin to press for a solution on Western Sahara. Moroccans, who are constitutionally bound not to challenge the country’s position on Western Sahara, have also quietly begun questioning the legality and high financial cost of the continuing occupation. Voices such as these would surely proliferate under a more democratic Morocco.

Similarly, a growing number of Moroccan settlers in the occupied territory are beginning to consider the idea of independence. But they are all too aware that if Morocco were to ever cede on the idea of Western Sahara’s independence, the tax and other economic privileges that they currently enjoy would come to an abrupt end.

A few years before his death, King Hassan II questioned whether it was in the long-term interest of Morocco to continue to suppress the rights of Sahrawis and thus to perpetuate an eternal fight for independence. Hassan’s concerns could well become prophetic. Given the current political dynamics of the Middle East and North Africa region, Morocco’s current ruler, Mohamed VI, would do well to realise that even the harshest forms of repression can be overcome by a determined population.

The Sahrawi people are profoundly convinced in the justice of their cause and undoubtedly believe that in the end, their position will prevail. The wind of liberty blowing across a Maghreb as well as the protests against the Moroccan occupation in November 2010 in Al-Ayun and other cities in the Western Sahara underline this hope. As the Tunisian poet Abu Al-Qassam Al-Shabbi wrote nearly a century ago warning unfair rulers of their faith, “when people decide to live, it is for the destiny to respond, darkness has to dissipate, and chains to break”.

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of ISS.

Think Africa Press

Sudanese army denies sheltering Ugandan LRA leader Kony

Sudan Tribune

April 27, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese army strongly denied allegations that it is providing shelter to the fugitive Ugandan leader of the Lord Resistance Army (LRA), Joseph Kony.

JPEG - 29.9 kb
Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) leader Major General Joseph Kony, is seen in an exclusive image at peace negotiations in Ri-Kwangba, southern Sudan November 30, 2008 (REUTERS/Africa24 Media)

The US-based group Resolve LRA Crisis Initiative said in a new report this week that the notorious leader recently directed killings from an enclave protected by the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF).

Until early this year, according to the report, Kony and some of his commanders were operating in Kafia Kingi, a disputed area along the Sudan-South Sudan border where African Union troops tasked with catching Kony don’t have access.

But SAF spokesperson Colonel al-Sawarmi Khalid Sa’ad told Sudan official news agency (SUNA) that the report is “baseless and rejected”.

“SAF has no renegade leaders. It is a united army and has no place for individual acts. SAF has no interest in adopting or sheltering rebels from other countries” he added.

During the two-decades Sudanese civil war, which ended in 2005 with a peace deal granting South Sudan the right to seceded in 2011, Uganda sided with the SPLM rebels who now form the government in Juba.

In response, Khartoum was widely accused of backing the LRA, which began operating in South Sudan and elsewhere in Central Africa having been forced out of northern Uganda by the Uganda People’s Defense Forces (UPDF).

The LRA was founded by Kony in his Acholi community amid repression from the UPDF. Its stated aim is to overthrow the government in Kampala and install the Bible’s Ten Commandments.

Across Uganda, CAR, DRC and South Sudan the LRA is accused of massive human rights abuses including rape, mutilation, murder and the recruitment of child soldiers.

However, the group is believed to only have a few hundred soldier’s left due to desertions and combined regional attempts – recently backed by United States army advisors and African Union troops – to end the conflict militarily.

(ST)

Sudan rebels attack in North Kordofan

Sudan Tribune

April 27, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) rebels swept through Umm Rawaba in North Kordofan state on Saturday morning in an attack that took the Sudanese government and observers by surprise.

JPEG - 14.7 kb
FILE – An armoured column of JEM vehicles drive in Darfur region (Reuters)

The rebels stormed the major town which lies around 500 kilometers south of the capital Khartoum utilizing 150 vehicles and killed 9 policemen, including a lieutenant, before withdrawing at approximately 2:00 pm local time.

The Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) spokesperson, Colonel al-Sawarmi Khalid Sa’ad, said that troops confronted the rebels after they arrived in Abu Kershola in the far north of South Kordofan state, adding that rebels then looted Alla-Kareem village before targeting Umm Rawaba.

Al-Sawarmi, who didn’t mention any killings, said that rebels destroyed the communication tower and electricity station in Um Rawaba and looted civilian property as well as gas stations.

He did not explain why the army did not stop them before they reached North Kordofan.

The Darfur Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), which launched an unprecedented assault on Sudan’s twin capital city of Omdurman in May 2008, confirmed its role in the attack.

“This is part of our strategy to overthrow the regime and we want to weaken the troops on the road towards Khartoum,” JEM spokesman Gibril Adam Bilal told Agence France Presse (AFP).

“This is an attack deep in Sudanese territory” Bilal added.

JEM is member of the SRF, which also includes the Sudan People Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N) fighting the army in South Kordofan and Blue Nile. It also includes the factions of Sudan Liberation Movement led by Minni Minnawi (SLM-MM) and another of Abdel-Wahid Mohamed Nur (SLM-AW).

“This is a significant shift in the war in Sudan,” Nur told AFP. “We are heading to Khartoum,” he said. “This is not a joke.”

Eyewitnesses inside Um Rawaba confirmed to Sudan Tribune the death of nine policemen at the hands of the rebels who, according to the sources, refrained from targeting civilians while they destroyed the judiciary headquarters, the power station and attacked three banks but were unable to rob them.

The eyewitnesses further added that rebels warned civilians against leaving their homes and informed them of potential aerial bombardments by SAF.

SAF’s warplanes hovered over the city for hours but did not carry out any bombings, the eyewitnesses said.

Umm Rawaba, with a population of several thousands, is about 100 kilometers east of the state capital El Obeid, home to a military airbase.

According to the same sources, SRF descended on the city from three directions, forcing authorities to shut down the main highway which connects Khartoum to  the White Nile and North Kordofan states.

Hundreds of Um Rawaba residents, who gathered in the city’s hospital where bodies of the 9 policemen lie, chanted anti-government slogans especially upon arrival of the city mayor.

Later in the day, SAF spokesperson told Sudan news agency (SUNA) that the “defeated” rebels withdrew and that the army is chasing the fighters who fled in different directions.

Fighting between the rebels and the army has been so far mainly limited to Darfur as well as South Kordofan and Blue Nile states bordering South Sudan, which seceded from Sudan in 2011.

Sudan’s 2nd Vice president, Al-Haj Adam Youssef, lambasted SRF saying that their acts are aimed at destroying the economic infrastructure of the country, stressing that his government would not “bend”, calling upon SRF to lay down arms and “bow to peace”.

The Sudanese parliament, in an emergency session for its subcommittee on members’ affairs yesterday, described the SRF move as an aggression to strip the nation from its gains and capabilities, calling for the need to defeat SRF militarily and popularly.

The parliament further announced that it will be summoning the defence minister to testify before it on  Monday on the circumstances of the attack and taking the necessary measures to  “eliminate” the SRF and its pockets.

On a separate front, the Sudan People Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N) which is part of the SRF, said it had seized Alremaila, Alkibeba, Alshiheta and Albejaya east of South Kordofan capital of Kadugli.

“[T]hese villages were controlled by popular defense forces and militias they inflicted heavy casualties both men and military equipment, this in retaliation to the killing of children and displace and looting the innocent people” SPLM-N statement said.

There was no comment from SAF on the SPLM-N claims.

(ST)